Good science is reproducible.
Is Tucker Carlson’s audience collapsing—or is that just a story people want to believe?
A viral post claims Carlson’s viewership is plummeting and suggests artificial engagement is keeping him afloat. But what evidence supports those claims?
I examine his YouTube subscriber growth, video performance, and views on X to separate slower growth from a shrinking audience. I also explain “emotional truth”: why a satisfying story can spread before anyone checks whether it’s accurate.
You don’t have to like Tucker Carlson to demand evidence for a claim about him. If you only check the stories you disagree with, you’re leaving yourself open to manipulation.
Find the data behind this video for free on my Substack:
Find the Global Warning Podcast on:
Like my shirts? Get your own at:
Source: Ryan McBeth
